Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice Table of Contents for May 2017

Editorial
Transitional UK copyright provisions
Julia Montero
Current Intelligence
Patents Court maintains injunction protecting Warner-Lambert’s second medical use patent for pregabalin
Joanna McCulloch ; Dr Christopher Hayes
Turkish Court of Appeal revisits the assessment of likelihood of confusion in case of weak trade marks … changing its approach
Uğur Aktekin ; Güldeniz Doğan Alkan; Zeynep Çağla Özcebe
Czech court finds that linking to unlicensed content does not infringe copyright if the website is not operated for profit
Juraj Vivoda
Delhi High Court provides broad interpretation of education exception in Indian copyright law
Devika Agarwal ; Radhika Agarwal
Delhi High Court upholds safe harbour for intermediaries in copyright disputes
Devika Agarwal; Radhika Agarwal
Swedish Patent and Market Court of Appeal orders major ISP to block access to The Pirate Bay and Swefilmer
Nedim Malovic
Trinidad High Court allows defendant to ‘win(e) with no worries’
Emir Crowne
eXtreme action against G-Force leaves them blushing in the locker room
Emma L. Flett; Joanna Balata
Practice Point
The CJEU decision in Stowarzyszenie ‘Oławska Telewizja Kablowa’, C-367/15, and punitive damages in copyright law: A Portuguese perspective
David Serras Pereira; Carlos Madureira
Articles
Creative Commons-ense? An analysis of tensions between copyright law and Creative Commons
Nick Scharf
Innovation and intellectual property policies in European Research Infrastructure Consortia—Part I: The Case of the European Spallation Source ERIC
Helen Yu; Jakob Blak Wested; Timo Minssen
The troubled waters of copyright safe harbours in India
Aradhya Sethia
Excessive rewards and compulsory licensing: the essential facilities doctrine and strategic patenting practices in the European pharmaceutical industry
Mari Minn
From GRUR Int.
Unfair trading practices in the supply chain and the co-ordination of European contract, competition and unfair competition law in their reaction to disparities in bargaining power
Jochen Glöckner
(Non-)regulation of online platforms and internet intermediaries – the facts: Context and overview of the state of play
Eva Inés Obergfell ; Alexander Thamer
IP in Review
Less parochialism: intellectual property in the wider context of international law
Nuno Sousa e Silva
Immateriality and materiality in intellectual property: an indisputable dichotomy or essentially entwined?
Gowri Nanayakkara
Erratum
Innovation and intellectual property policies in European Research Infrastructure Consortia—Part I: The Case of the European Spallation Source ERIC
Helen Yu; Jakob Blak Wested ; Timo Minssen
Anunțuri

Lasă un răspuns

Te rog autentifică-te folosind una dintre aceste metode pentru a publica un comentariu:

Logo WordPress.com

Comentezi folosind contul tău WordPress.com. Dezautentificare / Schimbă )

Poză Twitter

Comentezi folosind contul tău Twitter. Dezautentificare / Schimbă )

Fotografie Facebook

Comentezi folosind contul tău Facebook. Dezautentificare / Schimbă )

Fotografie Google+

Comentezi folosind contul tău Google+. Dezautentificare / Schimbă )

Conectare la %s

%d blogeri au apreciat asta: