<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dreptul comunitar al afacerilor. blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:19:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<language>ro</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<cloud domain='eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

			<item>
		<title>Principles for Conflict of Laws in Intellectual Property</title>
		<link>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/11/08/principles-for-conflict-of-laws-in-intellectual-property/</link>
		<comments>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/11/08/principles-for-conflict-of-laws-in-intellectual-property/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmsandru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conflictele jurisdictiilor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ierarhia normelor juridice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incercari europene (esuate sau nu)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proprietate intelectuala]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflict of Laws in Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Max Planck]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/?p=2584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Principles for Conflict of Laws in Intellectual Property
Second Preliminary Draft June 6, 2009
Prepared by the European Max Planck Group on Conflict of Laws in Intellectual Property
Aici
&#160;
       <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com&blog=1493460&post=2584&subd=eubusinesslaw&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/11/08/principles-for-conflict-of-laws-in-intellectual-property/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b22e3c84262703ad6574ee7ec155369e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">asociatie</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roland Vaubel, Constitutional courts as promoters of political centralization: lessons for the European Court of Justice</title>
		<link>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/11/07/roland-vaubel-constitutional-courts-as-promoters-of-political-centralization-lessons-for-the-european-court-of-justice/</link>
		<comments>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/11/07/roland-vaubel-constitutional-courts-as-promoters-of-political-centralization-lessons-for-the-european-court-of-justice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 10:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmsandru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CJCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflictele jurisdictiilor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drept si politica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ierarhia normelor juridice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisprudenta constitutionala comparata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Journal of Law and Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roland Vaubel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/?p=2581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Roland Vaubel, Constitutional courts as promoters of political centralization: lessons for the European Court of Justice, European Journal of Law and Economics, Dec 2009, Vol. 28, Iss. 3; pg. 203 [*]
Abstract (Summary)
A cross-section analysis covering up to 42 countries and including the usual control variables shows that central government outlays as a share of general [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com&blog=1493460&post=2581&subd=eubusinesslaw&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/11/07/roland-vaubel-constitutional-courts-as-promoters-of-political-centralization-lessons-for-the-european-court-of-justice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b22e3c84262703ad6574ee7ec155369e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">asociatie</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nicole Ahner, Final Instance: World Trade Organization &#8211; Unilateral Trade Measures in EU Climate Change Legislation</title>
		<link>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/11/07/nicole-ahner-final-instance-world-trade-organization-unilateral-trade-measures-in-eu-climate-change-legislation/</link>
		<comments>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/11/07/nicole-ahner-final-instance-world-trade-organization-unilateral-trade-measures-in-eu-climate-change-legislation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 07:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmsandru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Comisia Europeana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflictele jurisdictiilor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTO-OMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directive 2009/29/CE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicole Ahner]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/?p=2575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nicole Ahner, Final Instance: World Trade Organization &#8211; Unilateral Trade Measures in EU Climate Change Legislation, EUI RSCAS, 2009/58, Loyola de Palacio Programme on Energy Policy [*]
Abstract
Can the European Union (EU) introduce trade restrictive border measures under the auspices of environmental protection, whose purpose is at least inter alia to ‘level the competitive playing field’ [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com&blog=1493460&post=2575&subd=eubusinesslaw&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/11/07/nicole-ahner-final-instance-world-trade-organization-unilateral-trade-measures-in-eu-climate-change-legislation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b22e3c84262703ad6574ee7ec155369e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">asociatie</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consiliul de Stat (Franta) &#8211; recunoasterea efectului direct al directivelor</title>
		<link>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/consiliul-de-stat-franta-recunoasterea-efectului-direct-al-directivelor/</link>
		<comments>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/consiliul-de-stat-franta-recunoasterea-efectului-direct-al-directivelor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 11:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mihai</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ierarhia normelor juridice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[directiva (comunitara)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drept comparat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cohn-bendit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consiliu de stat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[directiva]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efect direct]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/?p=2570</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[si abandonarea jurisprudentei Cohn-Bendit.
Decizia aici. [N° 298348 Mme Perreux]
PS. Banuim ca va mai curge ceva apa [i.e. H2O] pe Sena, Marna, Tamisa, Amstel, Rin, Dunare si chiar Dambovita pana cand doctrinarul roman va lua la cunostinta si comenta recenta evolutie&#8230; pentru ca, nasha?, bietul de el a ramas cantonat, in genere, tot in negura inceputurilor [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com&blog=1493460&post=2570&subd=eubusinesslaw&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/11/06/consiliul-de-stat-franta-recunoasterea-efectului-direct-al-directivelor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/7d0d93e09eaa78f4a2851844856c7dbf?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">mihai</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>E oficial (sic!): Ecologismul e recunoscut drept credinta religioasa</title>
		<link>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/11/05/e-oficial-sic-ecologismul-e-recunoscut-drept-credinta-religioasa/</link>
		<comments>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/11/05/e-oficial-sic-ecologismul-e-recunoscut-drept-credinta-religioasa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mihai</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[revista presei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credinte & obiceiuri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ecologism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metafizica post-moderna]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/?p=2567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;In yesterday&#8217;s case Tim Nicholson, a former executive of the giant property company Grainger, claimed his redundancy last year was a direct result of his green opinions – which put him at odds with other senior executives within the firm. Mr Nicholson is taking the company, Britain&#8217;s largest residential landlord, to an employment tribunal to [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com&blog=1493460&post=2567&subd=eubusinesslaw&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/11/05/e-oficial-sic-ecologismul-e-recunoscut-drept-credinta-religioasa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/7d0d93e09eaa78f4a2851844856c7dbf?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">mihai</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Protocolul Consiliului cu privire la Cehia din 2009</title>
		<link>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/11/05/protocolul-consiliului-cu-privire-la-cehia-din-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/11/05/protocolul-consiliului-cu-privire-la-cehia-din-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmsandru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tratatul de la Lisabona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tratate UE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cehia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/?p=2565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[30-31 octombrie 2009:
aici
       <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com&blog=1493460&post=2565&subd=eubusinesslaw&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/11/05/protocolul-consiliului-cu-privire-la-cehia-din-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b22e3c84262703ad6574ee7ec155369e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">asociatie</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Curtea Constitutionala din Cehia se pronunta a doua oara cu privire la Tratatul de la Lisabona</title>
		<link>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/11/05/curtea-constitutionala-din-cehia-se-pronunta-a-doua-oara-cu-privire-la-tratatul-de-la-lisabona/</link>
		<comments>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/11/05/curtea-constitutionala-din-cehia-se-pronunta-a-doua-oara-cu-privire-la-tratatul-de-la-lisabona/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmsandru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Conflictele jurisdictiilor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drepturile omului]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tratatul de la Lisabona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tratate UE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cehia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/?p=2562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A doua hotarare a fost pronuntata la 3.11.2009
aici 
       <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com&blog=1493460&post=2562&subd=eubusinesslaw&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/11/05/curtea-constitutionala-din-cehia-se-pronunta-a-doua-oara-cu-privire-la-tratatul-de-la-lisabona/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b22e3c84262703ad6574ee7ec155369e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">asociatie</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jan Kleinheisterkamp, The Impact of Internationally Mandatory Laws on the Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements, LSE Legal Studies Working Paper No. 22/2009</title>
		<link>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/11/03/jan-kleinheisterkamp-the-impact-of-internationally-mandatory-laws-on-the-enforceability-of-arbitration-agreements-lse-legal-studies-working-paper-no-222009/</link>
		<comments>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/11/03/jan-kleinheisterkamp-the-impact-of-internationally-mandatory-laws-on-the-enforceability-of-arbitration-agreements-lse-legal-studies-working-paper-no-222009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmsandru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arbitraj si mediere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bibliografii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan Kleinheisterkamp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LSE Legal Studies Working Paper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/?p=2558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jan Kleinheisterkamp, The Impact of Internationally Mandatory Laws on the Enforceability of Arbitration Agreements (October 30, 2009). LSE Legal Studies Working Paper No. 22/2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1496923
Abstract:
This article examines the impact that internationally mandatory rules of the forum state may have on the effectiveness of arbitration agreements. This question arises when claims are based [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com&blog=1493460&post=2558&subd=eubusinesslaw&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/11/03/jan-kleinheisterkamp-the-impact-of-internationally-mandatory-laws-on-the-enforceability-of-arbitration-agreements-lse-legal-studies-working-paper-no-222009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b22e3c84262703ad6574ee7ec155369e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">asociatie</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rezolutia Consiliului din 23 octombrie 2009 privind o strategie consolidata pentru cooperarea vamala</title>
		<link>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/rezolutia-consiliului-din-23-octombrie-2009-privind-o-strategie-consolidata-pentru-cooperarea-vamala/</link>
		<comments>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/rezolutia-consiliului-din-23-octombrie-2009-privind-o-strategie-consolidata-pentru-cooperarea-vamala/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmsandru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consiliul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cooperare vamala]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rezolutie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/?p=2555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rezolutia Consiliului din 23 octombrie 2009 privind o strategie consolidata pentru cooperarea vamala 
JO 30.10.2009, C 260/1 {*}
       <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com&blog=1493460&post=2555&subd=eubusinesslaw&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/rezolutia-consiliului-din-23-octombrie-2009-privind-o-strategie-consolidata-pentru-cooperarea-vamala/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b22e3c84262703ad6574ee7ec155369e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">asociatie</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Audiolux, C-101/08</title>
		<link>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/audiolux-c-10108/</link>
		<comments>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/audiolux-c-10108/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmsandru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[societati comerciale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[actionari minoritari]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audiolux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-101/08]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[principii generale ale dreptului comunitar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/?p=2553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Audiolux, C-101/08:
Dreptul comunitar nu cuprinde un principiu general de drept conform căruia actionarii minoritari sunt protejati prin obligatia actionarului dominant care achizitionează sau exercită controlul unei societăti de a oferi acestora posibilitatea de a le cumpăra actiunile în aceleasi conditii precum cele convenite la achizitionarea unei participatii care conferă sau consolidează controlul actionarului dominant.
[*]
  [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com&blog=1493460&post=2553&subd=eubusinesslaw&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/audiolux-c-10108/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b22e3c84262703ad6574ee7ec155369e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">asociatie</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prima directiva a societatilor comerciale a fost republicata</title>
		<link>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/prima-directiva-a-societatilor-comerciale-a-fost-republicata/</link>
		<comments>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/prima-directiva-a-societatilor-comerciale-a-fost-republicata/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 21:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmsandru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[directiva (comunitara)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[societati comerciale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Directiva 2009/101/]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prima directiva a societatilor comerciale]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/?p=2549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Directiva 2009/101/CE A PARLAMENTULUI EUROPEAN sI A CONSILIULUI din 16 septembrie 2009 de coordonare, în vederea echivalării, a garantiilor impuse societătilor în statele membre, în întelesul articolului 48 al doilea paragraf din tratat, pentru protejarea intereselor asociatilor sau tertilor, JO 01.10.2009, L 258/11.
[*]
       <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com&blog=1493460&post=2549&subd=eubusinesslaw&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/prima-directiva-a-societatilor-comerciale-a-fost-republicata/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b22e3c84262703ad6574ee7ec155369e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">asociatie</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stalcirea limbii romane sub pretextul terminologiei specializate. Un exemplu</title>
		<link>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/29/stalcirea-limbii-romane-sub-pretextul-terminologiei-specializate-un-exemplu/</link>
		<comments>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/29/stalcirea-limbii-romane-sub-pretextul-terminologiei-specializate-un-exemplu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 20:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mihai</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Goagălizarea României sau neo-klingonismul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/?p=2546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pentru a marturisi deschis, suprinderea ne-a fost moderata (cf. si &#8220;nu mica ne-a fost surprinderea&#8221; etc.), constatand patrunderea pe sest a cunoscutului cuvant &#8220;locatzie&#8221; (sic!) - nu, nu in sensul cunoscut din dreptul civil &#8211; ci in sensul &#8220;tinerilor nostri&#8221;,  in dreptul comunitar, varianta oficiala&#8230;
Este vorba despre Directiva 2006/24, aceea cu pastrarea datelor din comunicatii electronice; [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com&blog=1493460&post=2546&subd=eubusinesslaw&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/29/stalcirea-limbii-romane-sub-pretextul-terminologiei-specializate-un-exemplu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/7d0d93e09eaa78f4a2851844856c7dbf?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">mihai</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>O scena, niste flori, alte flori &#8230;si demontatul scenei. Istoria se repeta</title>
		<link>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/o-scena-niste-flori-alte-flori-si-demontatul-scenei-istoria-se-repeta/</link>
		<comments>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/o-scena-niste-flori-alte-flori-si-demontatul-scenei-istoria-se-repeta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmsandru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Drept si politica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Franta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presedintia UE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Union pour la Méditerranée (2008)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/?p=2533</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[de data aceasta la francezi.
Asadar, din acest raport se poate observa cu usurinta cat de interesanta va fi pentru Romania presedintia UE.
Informatii.
       <img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com&blog=1493460&post=2533&subd=eubusinesslaw&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/o-scena-niste-flori-alte-flori-si-demontatul-scenei-istoria-se-repeta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b22e3c84262703ad6574ee7ec155369e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">asociatie</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yasuhiro Shigeta, The ECJ&#8217;s &#8216;Hard&#8217; Control over Compliance with International Environmental Law: Its Procedural and Substantive Aspects, International Community Law Review, 3/2009</title>
		<link>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/yasuhiro-shigeta-the-ecjs-hard-control-over-compliance-with-international-environmental-law-its-procedural-and-substantive-aspects-international-community-law-review-3-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/yasuhiro-shigeta-the-ecjs-hard-control-over-compliance-with-international-environmental-law-its-procedural-and-substantive-aspects-international-community-law-review-3-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmsandru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CJCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drept si economie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drept si politica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrare europeana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interpretarea "legilor"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metoda legislativa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[soft law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dreptul international al mediului]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Community Law Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MOX Plant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yasuhiro Shigeta]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/?p=2531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yasuhiro Shigeta, The ECJ&#8217;s &#8216;Hard&#8217; Control over Compliance with International Environmental Law: Its Procedural and Substantive Aspects, International Community Law Review, Volume 11, Number 3, September 2009, pp. 251-305.
Abstract:
This study shows that the ECJ, while not directly applying and interpreting environmental treaties, exercises procedurally and substantively &#8216;hard&#8217; control over compliance with EC legislation implementing those [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com&blog=1493460&post=2531&subd=eubusinesslaw&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/yasuhiro-shigeta-the-ecjs-hard-control-over-compliance-with-international-environmental-law-its-procedural-and-substantive-aspects-international-community-law-review-3-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b22e3c84262703ad6574ee7ec155369e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">asociatie</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chris Koedooder, Niki de Lang, Anti-terrorist Blacklisting in the European Union: The Influence of National Procedures on the Judgments of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities, Legal Issues of Economic Integration, vol. 36, 4/2009</title>
		<link>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/chris-koedooder-niki-de-lang-anti-terrorist-blacklisting-in-the-european-union-the-influence-of-national-procedures-on-the-judgments-of-the-court-of-first-instance-of-the-european-communities-lega/</link>
		<comments>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/chris-koedooder-niki-de-lang-anti-terrorist-blacklisting-in-the-european-union-the-influence-of-national-procedures-on-the-judgments-of-the-court-of-first-instance-of-the-european-communities-lega/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmsandru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CJCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drept si politica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drepturile omului]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalizare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ierarhia normelor juridice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incercari europene (esuate sau nu)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrare europeana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interpretarea "legilor"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drept comparat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisprudenta comunitara]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[proportionalitate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-terorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Koedooder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consiliul de Securitate ONU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instante nationale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues of Economic Integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niki de Lang]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TPI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/?p=2528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chris Koedooder, Niki de Lang, Anti-terrorist Blacklisting in the European Union: The Influence of National Procedures on the Judgments of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities, Legal Issues of Economic Integration, vol. 36, 4/2009, pp. 313–337
Summary:
The most prominent example of anti-terrorism measures is undoubtedly the freezing of funds of individuals or entities suspected [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com&blog=1493460&post=2528&subd=eubusinesslaw&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/chris-koedooder-niki-de-lang-anti-terrorist-blacklisting-in-the-european-union-the-influence-of-national-procedures-on-the-judgments-of-the-court-of-first-instance-of-the-european-communities-lega/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b22e3c84262703ad6574ee7ec155369e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">asociatie</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Giacomo Gattinara, The Relevance of WTO Dispute Settlement Decisions in the US Legal Order, Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 4/2009</title>
		<link>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/giacomo-gattinara-the-relevance-of-wto-dispute-settlement-decisions-in-the-us-legal-order-legal-issues-of-economic-integration-42009/</link>
		<comments>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/giacomo-gattinara-the-relevance-of-wto-dispute-settlement-decisions-in-the-us-legal-order-legal-issues-of-economic-integration-42009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 20:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmsandru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[UE-OMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UE-SUA (EU-USA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTO-OMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efectul direct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues of Economic Integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAFTA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OMC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTO Dispute Settlement Decisions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/?p=2525</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Giacomo Gattinara, The Relevance of WTO Dispute Settlement Decisions in the US Legal Order, Legal Issues of Economic Integration, Vol. 36, 4/2009, pp. 285–312
Summary:
This article addresses the issue of the relevance of World Trade Organization (WTO) adopted reports in the US legal order with specific attention paid to the role of the judiciary. Far from being [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com&blog=1493460&post=2525&subd=eubusinesslaw&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/26/giacomo-gattinara-the-relevance-of-wto-dispute-settlement-decisions-in-the-us-legal-order-legal-issues-of-economic-integration-42009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b22e3c84262703ad6574ee7ec155369e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">asociatie</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oliver Gutman, Cartesio Oktato es Szolgaltato bt: the ECJ gives its blessing to corporate exit taxes, British Tax Review, 2009. Iss. 4.</title>
		<link>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/24/oliver-gutman-cartesio-oktato-es-szolgaltato-bt-the-ecj-gives-its-blessing-to-corporate-exit-taxes-british-tax-review-2009-iss-4/</link>
		<comments>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/24/oliver-gutman-cartesio-oktato-es-szolgaltato-bt-the-ecj-gives-its-blessing-to-corporate-exit-taxes-british-tax-review-2009-iss-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 12:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmsandru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cartesio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Company law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Movement of Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[societati comerciale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articolul 43 CE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[British Tax Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oliver Gutman]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/?p=2516</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oliver Gutman, Cartesio Oktato es Szolgaltato bt: the ECJ gives its blessing to corporate exit taxes, British Tax Review, 2009. Iss. 4.
Abstract (Summary)
In the Cartesio Oktato es Szolgaltato bt case, the European Court of Justice held that Article 43 did not preclude the Hungarian rules. The judgment is a re-affirmation of the limits of Article [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com&blog=1493460&post=2516&subd=eubusinesslaw&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/24/oliver-gutman-cartesio-oktato-es-szolgaltato-bt-the-ecj-gives-its-blessing-to-corporate-exit-taxes-british-tax-review-2009-iss-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b22e3c84262703ad6574ee7ec155369e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">asociatie</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>CSDE: «Legea aplicabilă obligaţiilor contractuale conform Regulamentului (CE) nr. 593/2008 din 17 iunie 2008 (ROMA I)» (30.10.2009)</title>
		<link>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/19/csde-%c2%abnormele-obligatorii-in-regulamentul-ce-nr-5932008-al-parlamentului-european-si-al-consiliului-din-17-iunie-2008-privind-legea-aplicabila-obligatiilor-contractuale-roma-i%c2%bb-30-10/</link>
		<comments>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/19/csde-%c2%abnormele-obligatorii-in-regulamentul-ce-nr-5932008-al-parlamentului-european-si-al-consiliului-din-17-iunie-2008-privind-legea-aplicabila-obligatiilor-contractuale-roma-i%c2%bb-30-10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmsandru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CJCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conferinte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Privat in UE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interpretarea "legilor"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subsidiaritate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Suveranitate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Temeiul juridic al actelor CE-UE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulament (comunitar)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seminarii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tratate UE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Academia Romana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alina Oprea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anca Melinte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bogdan Trandafirescu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[C-133/08 (ICF)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSDE - Centrul de Studii de Drept European]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ioana Burduf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legea aplicabila obligatiilor contractuale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicolae Turcu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulamentul Roma I]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silvia Axinescu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Viviana Onaca]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/?p=2501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Centrul de Studii de Drept European (CSDE) al Institutului de Cercetări Juridice din cadrul Academiei Române organizează la data de la data de 30 octombrie 2009, ora 12,30
 la Universitatea Romano-Americana, Bld. Expozitiei, nr. 1B, Amfiteatrul Jean Monnet
 Conferinţa
«Legea aplicabilă obligaţiilor contractuale conform Regulamentului (CE) nr. 593/2008 al Parlamentului European şi al Consiliului din 17 iunie 2008 (Regulamentul [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com&blog=1493460&post=2501&subd=eubusinesslaw&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/19/csde-%c2%abnormele-obligatorii-in-regulamentul-ce-nr-5932008-al-parlamentului-european-si-al-consiliului-din-17-iunie-2008-privind-legea-aplicabila-obligatiilor-contractuale-roma-i%c2%bb-30-10/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b22e3c84262703ad6574ee7ec155369e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">asociatie</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jan Kleinheisterkamp, Internationally Mandatory Rules and Arbitration, Rabels Zeitschrift, Vol. 73, No. 4, October 2009</title>
		<link>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/18/jan-kleinheisterkamp-internationally-mandatory-rules-and-arbitration-rabels-zeitschrift-vol-73-no-4-october-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/18/jan-kleinheisterkamp-internationally-mandatory-rules-and-arbitration-rabels-zeitschrift-vol-73-no-4-october-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 09:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmsandru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Arbitraj si mediere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudenta comerciala]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract de agentie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contract de distribuitie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internationally Mandatory Rules and Arbitration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan Kleinheisterkamp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rabels Zeitschrift]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/?p=2498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jan Kleinheisterkamp, Internationally Mandatory Rules and Arbitration, Rabels Zeitschrift, Vol. 73, No. 4, October 2009
This article treats the impact that internationally mandatory rules of the forum state may have on the effectiveness of arbitration agreements if the claims are based on such internationally mandatory rules but the parties had submitted their contract to a foreign [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com&blog=1493460&post=2498&subd=eubusinesslaw&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/18/jan-kleinheisterkamp-internationally-mandatory-rules-and-arbitration-rabels-zeitschrift-vol-73-no-4-october-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b22e3c84262703ad6574ee7ec155369e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">asociatie</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friedrich Wenzel Bulst, The Application of Art. 82 EC to Abusive Exclusionary Conduct, Rabels Zeitschrift, 4/2009</title>
		<link>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/18/friedrich-wenzel-bulst-the-application-of-art-82-ec-to-abusive-exclusionary-conduct-rabels-zeitschrift-42009/</link>
		<comments>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/18/friedrich-wenzel-bulst-the-application-of-art-82-ec-to-abusive-exclusionary-conduct-rabels-zeitschrift-42009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 09:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmsandru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CJCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comisia Europeana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abuz de pozitie dominanta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[articolul 82 CE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Friedrich Wenzel Bulst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rabels Zeitschrift]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/?p=2496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Friedrich Wenzel Bulst, The Application of Art. 82 EC to Abusive Exclusionary Conduct, Rabels Zeitschrift, Vol. 73, No. 4, October 2009 [*]

The article addresses recent developments in the application of the prohibition of abuse of dominance in EC competition law. The European Commission has published a communication providing guidance on its enforcement priorities in applying Art. 82 [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com&blog=1493460&post=2496&subd=eubusinesslaw&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/18/friedrich-wenzel-bulst-the-application-of-art-82-ec-to-abusive-exclusionary-conduct-rabels-zeitschrift-42009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b22e3c84262703ad6574ee7ec155369e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">asociatie</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anatol Dutta, The Death of the Shareholder in the Conflict of Laws, Rabels Zeitschrift, Vol. 73, No. 4, October 2009</title>
		<link>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/17/anatol-dutta-the-death-of-the-shareholder-in-the-conflict-of-laws-rabels-zeitschrift-vol-73-no-4-october-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/17/anatol-dutta-the-death-of-the-shareholder-in-the-conflict-of-laws-rabels-zeitschrift-vol-73-no-4-october-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 13:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmsandru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CJCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cartesio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflictele jurisdictiilor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Company law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Movement of Companies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Privat in UE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uberseering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[societati comerciale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[actionar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anatol Dutta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Centros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CONFLICTOFLAWS.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inspire Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rabels Zeitschrift]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/?p=2489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anatol Dutta, The Death of the Shareholder in the Conflict of Laws, Rabels Zeitschrift, Vol. 73, No. 4, October 2009
Abstract:
The death of the shareholder raises the question how the law applicable to the company and the law governing the succession in the deceased shareholder’s estate have to be delimitated. This borderline becomes more and more [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com&blog=1493460&post=2489&subd=eubusinesslaw&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/17/anatol-dutta-the-death-of-the-shareholder-in-the-conflict-of-laws-rabels-zeitschrift-vol-73-no-4-october-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b22e3c84262703ad6574ee7ec155369e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">asociatie</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>articolul 10 CEDO aplicabil societatilor comerciale: Hachette Filipacchi Associés (&#8220;Ici Paris&#8221;) / Franta</title>
		<link>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/articolul-10-cedo-aplicabil-societatilor-comerciale-hachette-filipacchi-associes-ici-paris-franta/</link>
		<comments>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/articolul-10-cedo-aplicabil-societatilor-comerciale-hachette-filipacchi-associes-ici-paris-franta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmsandru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CEDO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SC la CEDO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[articolul 10 CEDO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Franta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hachette Filipacchi Associés ("Ici Paris")]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[libertatea de expresie]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/?p=2485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hachette Filipacchi Associés (&#8220;Ici Paris&#8221;) c/ France, requête n° 12268/03.
Droit à la liberté d&#8217;expression (article 10 de la Convention de sauvegarde des droit de l&#8217;homme et des libertés fondamentales)
Dans l&#8217;affaire Hachette Filipacchi Associés (&#8220;Ici Paris&#8221;) c/ France, requête n° 12268/03, la Cour européenne des droits de l&#8217;homme, le 23 juillet 2009, retient à l&#8217;unanimité la violation [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com&blog=1493460&post=2485&subd=eubusinesslaw&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/14/articolul-10-cedo-aplicabil-societatilor-comerciale-hachette-filipacchi-associes-ici-paris-franta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b22e3c84262703ad6574ee7ec155369e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">asociatie</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>J. BREYER: despre federalismul din Statele Unite ale Americii, Elvetia, Germania si Uniunea Europeana (1997)</title>
		<link>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/j-breyer-despre-federalismul-din-statele-unite-ale-americii-elvetia-germania-si-uniunea-europeana-1997/</link>
		<comments>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/j-breyer-despre-federalismul-din-statele-unite-ale-americii-elvetia-germania-si-uniunea-europeana-1997/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmsandru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CJCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflictele jurisdictiilor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalizare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ierarhia normelor juridice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incercari europene (esuate sau nu)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrare europeana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interpretarea "legilor"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metoda legislativa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UE-SUA (EU-USA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drept comparat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisprudenta constitutionala comparata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birocratie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/?p=2478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sau cum ar veni &#8220;the use of foreign law &#38; doctrine in American courts&#8221;&#8230;Ori despre modele de &#8220;fédéralisme d’exécution&#8220;.
&#8220;The federal systems of Switzerland, Germany, and the European Union, for example, all provide that constituent states, not federal bureaucracies, will themselves implement many of the laws, rules, regulations, or decrees enacted by the central &#8220;federal&#8221; body.&#8221;
Supreme [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com&blog=1493460&post=2478&subd=eubusinesslaw&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/j-breyer-despre-federalismul-din-statele-unite-ale-americii-elvetia-germania-si-uniunea-europeana-1997/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b22e3c84262703ad6574ee7ec155369e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">asociatie</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Outer Limits of European Union Law (Edited by Catherine Barnard and Okeoghene Odudu), Hart Publishing, 2009</title>
		<link>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/11/the-outer-limits-of-european-union-law-edited-by-catherine-barnard-and-okeoghene-odudu-hart-publishing-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/11/the-outer-limits-of-european-union-law-edited-by-catherine-barnard-and-okeoghene-odudu-hart-publishing-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 17:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmsandru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bibliografii]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recenzie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catherine Barnard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hart Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Okeoghene Odudu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/?p=2476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Outer Limits of European Union Law (Edited by Catherine Barnard and Okeoghene Odudu), Hart, 2009 [*]
A commonly expressed view is that the citizens and the Member States are destined to be overcome by the European Union. There is a sense that the Union of today is not what was intended to be created or [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com&blog=1493460&post=2476&subd=eubusinesslaw&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/11/the-outer-limits-of-european-union-law-edited-by-catherine-barnard-and-okeoghene-odudu-hart-publishing-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b22e3c84262703ad6574ee7ec155369e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">asociatie</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steven Greer, Andrew Williams, Human Rights in the Council of Europe and the EU: Towards &#8216;Individual&#8217;, &#8216;Constitutional&#8217; or &#8216;Institutional&#8217; Justice?, European Law Journal, 4/2009</title>
		<link>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/11/steven-greer-andrew-williams-human-rights-in-the-council-of-europe-and-the-eu-towards-individual-constitutional-or-institutional-justice-european-law-journal-4-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/11/steven-greer-andrew-williams-human-rights-in-the-council-of-europe-and-the-eu-towards-individual-constitutional-or-institutional-justice-european-law-journal-4-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 08:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dmsandru</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CEDO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CJCE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conflictele jurisdictiilor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drept si politica]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drepturile omului]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ierarhia normelor juridice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Incercari europene (esuate sau nu)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Integrare europeana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interpretarea "legilor"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tratatul de la Lisabona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jurisprudenta constitutionala comparata]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tratate UE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andrew Williams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consiliul Europei]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Law Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steven Greer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/?p=2467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steven Greer, Andrew Williams, Human Rights in the Council of Europe and the EU: Towards &#8216;Individual&#8217;, &#8216;Constitutional&#8217; or &#8216;Institutional&#8217; Justice?, European Law Journal, Oxford: Jul 2009. Vol. 15, Iss. 4;
ABSTRACT
The European Convention on Human Rights, promulgated by the Council of Europe in 1950, is widely regarded as the world&#8217;s most successful experiment in the trans-national [...]<img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com&blog=1493460&post=2467&subd=eubusinesslaw&ref=&feed=1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://eubusinesslaw.wordpress.com/2009/10/11/steven-greer-andrew-williams-human-rights-in-the-council-of-europe-and-the-eu-towards-individual-constitutional-or-institutional-justice-european-law-journal-4-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/b22e3c84262703ad6574ee7ec155369e?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">asociatie</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>