Antitrust si marketing
mai 30, 2008Gerlinger v. Amazon.com Inc., No. 05-17328, U.S. 9th Circuit, May 27, 2008
In an antitrust action challenging a marketing agreement between the booksellers Amazon.com and Borders, dismissal of the action is affirmed where plaintiff lacked standing because he did not show that he ever purchased an item for a higher price than he would have paid had there been no marketing agreement, and thus he had suffered no injury-in-fact. [*]
